Sunday, December 31, 2017


What vanity or lack of wisdom drives
The guiding spirits of this age to doubt
The fact that laws celestial rule the lives
Of men and cannot be infringed without
Incurring penalties that must be paid
For individual or collective breach,
In strict accordance with the canons laid
For our collective crimes or sins of each?


Undoubtedly impartial jurists sift
The actions which debase us or uplift,
And after judging the ancestral pool
Decree a just reward, delayed or swift.

When deathless laws, we clearly understand,
Rule mighty suns and planets, sea and land,
Could not the wise Creator find one which
Would keep this moving lump of clay in hand?

Nor learned skepticism nor other trash,
Now ranked as wisdom, shall survive the crash,
Which soon will come to teach our wiseacres
That godless reason can become a curse,
And breed Satanic minds, if left alone,
With matchless intellect but hearts of stone:
A crop which is inevitable if
The attitude of scholars, hard and stiff
Towards sublime belief and faith, does not
To Revelation its true place allot.

Can we determine, when we ponder deep
On it that heaven has framed no laws to keep
Mankind upon the Path to reach the goal
It has appointed for the human soul;
And men are free to act as they decide,
To wallow in sin or to drown in pride,
And there is no Almighty Power to deal
With them, the fever of the mind to heal?

Hence, I do not predict but just inform
The world about a mighty Cosmic Law,
Which soon may raise a hideous global storm,
Out of the present groove mankind to draw.

Existence of this Force may soon be felt
When steel and cement walls like wax will melt,
And fuse to rise in clouds of fiery dust;
The Wrath of Heav'n on man's unbridled lust,
Against which every prophet raised his voice,
But often failed to sway the fatal choice.

Those who treat nature as a lifeless rock,
Insensible to virtue, vice and crime,
And fancy that its motion, like a clock,
They can adjust at will from time to time,
One awful day must see it come to life
Confronting them with fierce, aggressive swarms,
And then with loss, distress and slaughter rife
The whole of nature will seem up in arms.

Hence when disastrous situations rise,
Producing consternation and dismay,
A wise man can with confidence surmise:
The Law has been infringed in some way.

Destructive wars that cause the world concern
Present no riddle to the enlightened mind,
Which in the raging tempest can discern
The attempt of nature safety-vents to find.

Behold the time has come when once again
The auguries of prophets shall come true,
And man, a rebel grown too proud and vain,
With tears for heaven's clemency shall sue.

Gopi Krishna ~ The Shape of Events to Come

PM JUSTIN TRUDEAU - AGA KHAN CONFLICT OF INTEREST REPORT


Last Christmas (2016), the Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his family, a Minister from his Cabinet ( Seamus O'Regan) and his "husband" (he is homosexual), the President of the Liberal party Anna Gainey and her husband Tom Pitfield spent their holidays on the Aga Khan IV's private Bell island in the Bahamas (pictured above).

Earlier this month, the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner of Canada - Mary Dawson - released her scathing investigative report in which she found and wrote that PM Justin Trudeau violated 4 clauses from the Conflict of Interest Act and Code by travelling on the Aga Khan's private helicopter and vacationing on the Aga Khan's private island.

In her report, Dawson writes (excerpts):

"Subsection 14(1) of the Members’ Code prohibits a Member and any member of the Member’s family from accepting, directly or indirectly, any gift or other benefit, except compensation authorized by law, that might reasonably be seen to have been given to influence the Member in the exercise of a duty or function of his or her office. Paragraph 11(2)(b) of the Act provides an exception from this prohibition where the gift or advantage is given by a relative or friend.

I found that Mr. Trudeau, as Prime Minister, contravened section 11 of the Act when he or his family accepted the gifts of hospitality from the Aga Khan and the use of his private island in March and December 2016. Because there was ongoing official business between the Government of Canada and the Aga Khan at the time each invitation was accepted, Mr. Trudeau, as Prime Minister, was in a position to be able to advance some of the matters of interest to the Aga Khan. As well, the Foundation was registered to lobby the Office of the Prime Minister at that time. For these reasons, I determined that the vacations accepted by Mr. Trudeau or his family might reasonably be seen to have been given to influence Mr. Trudeau.

I found that the exception provided in paragraph 11(2)(b) of the Act for gifts from relatives and friends did not apply in this case. Mr. Trudeau’s relationship with the Aga Khan was based on a family connection rooted in a friendship between the Aga Khan and Mr. Trudeau’s father thirty years earlier. However, there were no private interactions between Mr. Trudeau and the Aga Khan until Mr. Trudeau became Leader of the Liberal Party of Canada. This led me to conclude that their relationship cannot be described as one of friends for the purposes of the Act."
Link to the entire report (PDF): https://www.google.ca/url…

In response to her damning report, PM Justin Trudeau offered Canadians a brief apology on TV by saying "I am sorry," all the while defending himself of breaching any conflict of interest and/or ethical codes by arguing that the Aga Khan is nothing more than a close family and personal "friend" who had invited the PM, his family and friends to spend the holidays with him on his private island in the Bahamas.

However, Mary Dawson wrote in her report that she did not find any convincing evidence during her investigations to support the claim that PM Justin Trudeau and the Aga Khan were only "friends" in the legal and true sense of the word. " I have already concluded in relation to section 11 that the relationship between Mr. Trudeau and the Aga Khan does not fall within the meaning of “friends” as contemplated for the purposes of the Act," writes Dawson.

Moreover, in 2016 while Justin Trudeau was serving as PM of Canada, the Aga Khan Foundation lobbied the Canadian government for funds and the Trudeau administration gave the Aga Khan Foundation a grant of +$49 MILLION, as the following official document from the Canadian government/Canadian Revenue Agency reveals: http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/…/sr…/t3010form23sched6-eng.action…


The Aga Khan is the Chairman and one of the directors of the Aga Khan Foundation which is registered in Canada to lobby the Canadian government for funds, including the Prime Minister's Office. To date (2017), the Canadian government has granted the Aga Khan Foundation in excess of $330 MILLION for so-called "humanitarian" and "development" projects in mostly Africa and Asia.

As Mary Dawson writes in her report:

" The Aga Khan is the founder and chair of the board of directors of the Aga Khan Development Network, the Aga Khan Foundation Canada (Foundation) and the Global Centre for Pluralism. He has a long-standing relationship with the Government of Canada, which since 1981 has contributed nearly $330 million to projects supported by the Foundation.

I found that Mr. Trudeau contravened section 21 of the Act when he did not recuse himself from discussions that provided an opportunity to improperly further the private interest associated with one of the institutions of the Aga Khan and that he contravened section 5 for failing to arrange his private affairs to avoid such an opportunity. As well, the Foundation was registered to lobby the Office of the Prime Minister at that time."

In response to questions by the press about these blatant conflict of interests, PM Justin Trudeau had difficulty forming a coherent sentence let alone uttering a coherent response, as this embarrasing video reveals: https://globalnews.ca/…/trudeau-explains-why-he-didnt-consi…

Note: The princely Christmas vacation of Prince Minister Justin Trudeau and his family cost Canadian taxpayers + $215,000 ~ the equivalent of several years of labor/wages for the average Canadian! And while Prince Minister Justin Trudeau and his family lavishly celebrate Christmas on a private island in the Bahamas with his lobbyist "friend" using Canadian taxpayers money, millions of hard working canadians are struggling daily to make ends meet every month in Canada...

Arya Vrilya

DEL BIGTREE'S LEGAL NOTICE TO THE SECRETARY OF THE HHS FOR "SAFE" VACCINES (AN OXYMORON)



Del Bigtree is threatening to sue the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) for failing to enforce and provide "mandates for safer childhood vaccines" as stipulated under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA). Link to his letter: http://www.icandecide.com/white-papers/ICAN-HHS-Notice.pdf

In his letter, Del BigTree is clearly arguing and lobbying in favor of "mandates for safer childhood vaccines" and "safer vaccines" (an oxymoron). Del Bigtree writes:

"The 1986 Act expressly requires that you, as the Secretary, “shall make or assure improvements in … the licensing … and research on vaccines, in order to reduce the risks of adverse reactions to vaccines.” (42 U.S.C. § 300aa-27(a)(2).) The 1986 Act expressly provides that you, as the Secretary, “shall make or assure improvements in … adverse reaction reporting … in order to reduce the risks of adverse reactions to vaccines.” (42 U.S.C. § 300aa-27(a)(2).) The 1986 Act expressly provides that you, as the Secretary, “shall promote the development of childhood vaccines that result in fewer and less adverse reactions” and “shall make or assure improvements in … the … labeling, warning, … and research on vaccines, in order to reduce the risks of adverse reactions to vaccines.” (42 U.S.C. § 300aa-27(a)(2)."

How can you Del Bigtree threaten to sue the HHS under the 1986 NCVIA for failing to enforce and provide "mandates for safer childhood vaccines" when in fact Congress voted the 1986 NCVIA to shield the industry from State design-defect lawsuits resulting from vaccine-related injuries and deaths based on the industry's own arguments and fact that vaccines are inherently and "unavoidably unsafe" and dangerous by their very nature ?

In 1986 the US Congress voted a law - The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) - that granted vaccine manufacturers legal immunity and impunity against all vaccine-related injuries and deaths. The Act stipulates that: " No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death: (1) resulting from unavoidable side effects; or (2) solely due to the manufacturer's failure to provide direct warnings."

In other words, vaccine manufacturers are not legally liable for vaccine-related injuries and/or death if the injury or death resulted from "side effects" that were "unavoidable" even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings. The NCVIA clearly stipulates and admits that vaccine-related injuries and/or deaths resulting from "side effects" are "unavoidable" even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings.

Therefore, it is not possible for the Secretary of the HHS to enforce and provide "mandates for safer childhood vaccines" since vaccines are by their very nature inherently and "unavoidably" unsafe and dangerous as the 1986 NCVIA clearly stipulates and admits and carry "unavoidable adverse side effects" as the US Supreme Court ruled in 2011.

In 2011, The US Supreme Court (in Bruesewitz v. Wyeth) was asked to rule on whether Congress had intended for the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act to preempt State design-defect lawsuits. Although the Supreme Court did not specifically address and study the safety of vaccines, it nevertheless ruled that the NCVIA preempted State design-defect lawsuits due to the fact that vaccines carry "unavoidable adverse sid effects." As a result, the industry was de facto granted legal immunity and impunity from all injuries and deaths resulting from vaccines in the US! http://www.washingtonpost.com/…/…/02/22/AR2011022206008.html

In lieu of sueing vaccine manufacturers for vaccine injuries and deaths in the courts, victims could only file a claim for compensation through the (US taxpayers-funded) National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP). According to official data published by the NVICP and the HHS, the US government (i.e. US taxpayers) has paid over 3,5 BILLION dollars in compensation to 17,732 victims of vaccine injury in the US from 1988-2017 ~ 16,523 injuries and 1,209 deaths (see data enclosed): https://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensa…/…/statisticsreport.pdf

Instead of lobbying and threatening to sue the Secretary of the HHS to enforce and provide "mandates for safer childhood vaccines" and "safer vaccines," you Del Bigtree and your +50 signatory organizational partners and millions of supporters should instead lobby Congress to REPEAL the 1986 NCVIA which has de facto given the industry legal immunity and impunity related to all vaccine-related injuries and deaths (the source of the problem).

You Del BigTree write:

"The first step in assuring safer vaccines is to identify what harms they cause." I vehemently disagree with this statement. In my opinion, the first step in protecting pregnant women, newborns, children and adults alike from the inherently and "unavoidably unsafe" and dangerous nature of vaccines is to REPEAL the 1986 NCVIA so that the industry (not the HHS) is both held legally responsible for "vaccine safety" (never mind the oxymoron) and held legally liable for all vaccine-related injuries and deaths in a court of law, thereby sealing the murderous vaccine industry's coffin in lieu of ours.

You further write:

" HHS can do better. With hundreds of vaccines in the pipeline it must do better. Avoiding injury to these children is not only a moral and ethical duty, but will in fact strengthen the vaccine program. Every parent that does not witness their child suffer a serious reaction after vaccination, such as a seizure or paralysis, is another parent that will not add their voice to the growing chorus of parents opposed to HHS’s vaccine program due to safety concerns. The first step in avoiding these harms and helping children already harmed is admitting there are deficiencies and working diligently to improve vaccine safety. Vaccines can and do cause serious injury and HHS needs to work diligently to identify and reduce these harms."

So you Del BigTree want to "improve vaccine safety" to "strengthen the vaccine program" "with hundreds of vaccines in the pipeline" ?🤔
http://www.phrma.org/…/list-of-medicines-in-development-for…

"Vaccine safety" is an oxymoron. Vaccines are inherently unsafe and dangerous as the 1986 NCVIA clearly stipulates and "unavoidably unsafe" as the US Supreme Court has upheld and ruled in 2011.
Last but not least, the science behind "vaccine safety" is corrupted by the industry, as this investigative article reveals: http://vaccineimpact.com/…/the-corruption-of-science-who-f…/

BREAKING UPDATE (14 November, 2017):

TRUMP APPOINTS FORMER TOP PHARMA EXECUTIVE AS SECRETARY OF THE HHS: PUTTING THE FOX IN CHARGE OF THE HENHOUSE...

President Donald J. Trump has appointed a former top pharmaceutical executive (Alex Azar) as Secretary of the Dept of Health and Human Services (HHS) tasked with regulating the phamaceutical industry and assuring the safety, effectiveness, quality, and security of pharmaceutical products manufactured and sold in the U.S, including the safety of vaccines: https://www.washingtonpost.com/…/ad6a4e16-c408-11e7-84bc-5e…

" While at Lilly, Azar oversaw the sale of some of the company’s most profitable and controversial products. These include: recombinant bovine growth hormone (rBGH), which Lilly bought from Monsanto and which increases the risk of developing breast and gastrointestinal cancers; Thimerosal, a mercury-containing vaccine preservative linked to neurodevelopmental problems in infants and children; and Prozac, a highly profitable drug used to treat depression that was later found to actually do nothing more than a placebo to decrease most forms of depression but instead increased suicidal tendencies. If confirmed, Azar would be tasked with “assuring the safety, effectiveness, quality, and security of pharmaceutical products manufactured and sold in the U.S," including the "safety" of vaccines": http://www.mintpressnews.com/big-pharmas-azar-head-hhs-t…/…/

"Eli Lilly is the inventor and was the primary manufacturer of thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative used in vaccines that is linked to autism and other neurological disorders. Prior to employment at Eli Lilly, under George W. Bush, Azar was general counsel and later deputy secretary of HHS at the time the decision was made to give an expedited efficacy and safety review to Gardasil, a vaccine for human papilloma virus produced by Merck that has enormous safety issues."

"As general counsel (head attorney) for HHS, Azar participated in the Autism Omnibus Proceeding that denied more than 5000 claims of vaccine injury, even though HHS settled one of the test cases that found that Hannah Poling’s autism was indeed caused by vaccine injury. " http://healthimpactnews.com/…/president-trump-nominates-bi…/

Now connect the dots with Del Bigtree's legal notice to the Secretary of the HHS to enforce "mandates for safer childhood vaccines" and ensuring "vaccine safety" Once Azar/HHS accepts and implements Del Bigtree's legal notice to enforce and provide "safer childhood vaccines" and "safe vaccines," the HHS will then rubber stamp and label vaccines as "safe" and the US govt will legally mandate and forcefully inject pregnant women, newborns, children and adults alike with hundreds of "safe" vaccines waiting in the pipeline (+250 as of 2017), opening the floodgates to the Vaccine Holocaust...

Link to Del Bigtree's Youtube video on his legal notice to the Secretary of the HHS/Alex Azar:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=116&v=7JFENSq-YaM

Arya Vrilya

ROBERT F. KENNEDY LOBBYING FOR "VACCINE SAFETY" (AN OXYMORON)


" We are not anti-vaccine. We are pro vaccine safety. It's time to bring scientific integrity to our nation's vaccine program." Robert F. Kennedy, Jr
 
Robert F. Kennedy has embarked on a crusade for "vaccine safety." (an oxymoron) In his own words, Kennedy says and writes:

" State legislatures and governors throughout the US are considering passing mandatory vaccine mandates, and the facts in this video (link below) are facts that every political leader ought to have and understand. The government is asking healthy children to be vaccinated with shots that have not undergone a rigorous safety process. Vaccine injuries can and do happen. Our children deserve better. We are asking for everyone’s help to demand vaccine safety science. Our government health leaders in charge of protecting children’s health are urging parents to vaccinate without doing the science necessary to prove all vaccines are safe for all children.

“We all want the best for America’s children. We need to start with good science and a clean regulatory process. We want to make sure that the conflicts are removed from the regulators who are making decisions over our vaccines and that the vaccines that our children get are as safe as they can possibly be, that the science is strong and robust. None of that is possible unless we first accomplish World Mercury Project’s 6 steps to vaccine safety. Our 6 Steps to Vaccine Safety will create scientific integrity and a robust, transparent regulatory process."

We are not anti-vaccine. We are pro vaccine safety. It's time to bring scientific integrity to our nation's vaccine program. https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/vaccine-safety-project#/

Personal observations and comments:

Primo, Kennedy is exclusively blaming vaccine-related injuries and deaths on the lack of "vaccine safety science" and on a flawed and corrupt regulatory system, without addressing let alone mentionning the inherently and "unavoidably unsafe" and dangerous nature of vaccines as clearly stipulated in both the 1986 National Childhood Vaccination Injury Act (NCVIA) and in the 2011 US Supreme Court ruling that upheld and ruled that vaccines come with unavoidable adverse side effects.

In 1986 the US Congress voted a law - The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) - that granted vaccine manufacturers legal immunity and impunity against all vaccine-related injuries and deaths. The Act stipulates that: " No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death: (1) resulting from unavoidable side effects; or (2) solely due to the manufacturer's failure to provide direct warnings." https://www.congress.gov/bill/99th-congress/house-bill/5546

In other words, vaccine manufacturers are not legally liable for vaccine-related injuries and/or death if the injury or death resulted from "side effects" (including brain damage, paralysis and death) that were "unavoidable" even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings.

Moreover In 2011, The US Supreme Court (in Bruesewitz v. Wyeth) was asked to rule on whether Congress had intended for the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act to preempt State design-defect lawsuits. Although the Supreme Court did not specifically address and study the safety of vaccines, it nevertheless ruled that the NCVIA preempted State design-defect lawsuits due to the fact that vaccines come with "unavoidable adverse side effects." As a result, the industry was de facto granted legal immunity and impunity from all injuries and deaths resulting from vaccines in the US. http://www.washingtonpost.com/…/…/02/22/AR2011022206008.html

In lieu of sueing vaccine manufacturers for vaccine injuries and deaths in the courts, victims could only file a claim for compensation through the (US taxpayers-funded) National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP). According to official data published by the NVICP and the HHS, the US government (i.e. US taxpayers) has paid over 3,5 BILLION dollars in compensation to 17,732 victims of vaccine injury in the US from 1988-2017 ~ 16,523 injuries and 1,209 deaths (see data enclosed): https://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensa…/…/statisticsreport.pd


However, it should be noted that this data does not take into account and reflect all of the vaccine-related injuries and deaths in the US since not all victims file a claim of compensation through the NVICP, and of those that do only about a third receive compensation related to vaccine-related injuries/deaths.

Incredibly however, Kennedy does not address let alone mention the 1986 NCVIA and/or the 2011 US Supreme Court ruling that clearly stipulates and admits that vaccines come with "unavoidablye adverse side effects." The NCVIA clearly stipulates and admits that vaccine-related injuries and/or deaths resulting from "side effects" are "unavoidable" even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings.

Therefore, simply addressing "vaccine safety" science and the flawed and corrupt regulatory system without acknowledging and adressing the fact that vaccines are inherently and "unavoidably unsafe" and dangerous by their very nature will NOT result in achieving your stated goal of "vaccine safety" (never mind the oxymoron.)

The first step in protecting pregnant women, newborns, children and adults alike from the inherently and "unavoidably unsafe" and dangerous nature of vaccines is to REPEAL the 1986 NCVIA so that the industry is both held legally responsible for "vaccine safety" (not the HHS) and held legally liable for all vaccine-related injuries and deaths in a court of law, thereby sealing the murderous vaccine industry's coffin in lieu of ours.

"Vaccine safety" is an oxymoron. Vaccines are inherently unsafe and dangerous as the 1986 NCVIA clearly stipulates and "unavoidably unsafe" as the US Supreme Court has upheld and ruled in 2011.
Last but not least, the science behind "vaccine safety" has been hijacked and corrupted by the industry itself, as the following investigative article reveals: http://vaccineimpact.com/…/the-corruption-of-science-who-f…/

Furthermore, Kennedy argues and writes: “We want to make sure that the conflicts are removed from the regulators who are making decisions over our vaccines and that the vaccines that our children get are as safe as they can possibly be, that the science is strong and robust. None of that is possible unless we first accomplish World Mercury Project’s 6 steps to vaccine safety.” https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/vaccine-safety-project#/

Step 3 of the World Mercury Project's "steps to vaccine safety" stipulates: "ENSURE ALL INVOLVED WITH FEDERAL VACCINE APPROVALS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ARE FREE FROM CONFLICTS OF INTEREST."

However, Alex Azar, the Secretary of US Dept of Human Health and Services (HHS) (the federal agency mandated for regulating the pharmaceutical industry and insuring the "safety" of vaccines) is a former top pharmaceutical executive. In fact, on 13 Novembre 2017 President Donald J. Trump appointed a former top pharmaceutical executive (Alex Azar) as Secretary of the Dept of Health and Human Services (HHS) tasked with regulating the phamaceutical industry and assuring the safety, effectiveness, quality, and security of pharmaceutical products manufactured and sold in the U.S, including the safety of vaccines: https://www.washingtonpost.com/…/ad6a4e16-c408-11e7-84bc-5e…

" While at Lilly, Azar oversaw the sale of some of the company’s most profitable and controversial products. These include: recombinant bovine growth hormone (rBGH), which Lilly bought from Monsanto and which increases the risk of developing breast and gastrointestinal cancers; Thimerosal, a mercury-containing vaccine preservative linked to neurodevelopmental problems in infants and children; and Prozac, a highly profitable drug used to treat depression that was later found to actually do nothing more than a placebo to decrease most forms of depression but instead increased suicidal tendencies. If confirmed, Azar would be tasked with “assuring the safety, effectiveness, quality, and security of pharmaceutical products manufactured and sold in the U.S," including the "safety" of vaccines. http://www.mintpressnews.com/big-pharmas-azar-head-hhs-t…/…/

"Eli Lilly is the inventor and was the primary manufacturer of thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative used in vaccines that is linked to autism and other neurological disorders. Prior to employment at Eli Lilly, under George W. Bush, Azar was general counsel and later deputy secretary of HHS at the time the decision was made to give an expedited efficacy and safety review to Gardasil, a vaccine for human papilloma virus produced by Merck that has enormous safety issues."

"As general counsel (head attorney) for HHS, Azar participated in the Autism Omnibus Proceeding that denied more than 5000 claims of vaccine injury, even though HHS settled one of the test cases that found that Hannah Poling’s autism was indeed caused by vaccine injury. " http://healthimpactnews.com/…/president-trump-nominates-bi…/

Therefore, how can you Robert Kennedy achieve your stated objectives of obtaining "vaccines that are as safe as possible & science that is robust" given the fact that vaccines are inherently and "unavoidably unsafe" and dangerous as both the 1986 NCVIA and the 2011 US Supreme Court ruling clearly stipulate and admit, and advocating for "a regulatory agency that has unquestionable integrity and is free from conflicts of interests" with Alex Azar as Secretary of the HHS mandated to regulate the pharmaceutical industry and the "safety" of vaccines ?

Arya Vrilya

CONGRESS HAS GIVEN THE VACCINE INDUSTRY LEGAL IMMUNITY FOR VACCINE-RELATED INJURIES & DEATHS


In 1986, the US Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) which de facto gave vaccine manufacturers and the pharmaceutical industry total legal immunity and impunity for all vaccine-related injuries and deaths.

The NCVIA stipulates that: " No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death: (1) resulting from unavoidable side effects; or (2) solely due to the manufacturer's failure to provide direct warnings." https://www.congress.gov/bill/99th-congress/house-bill/5546

In other words, vaccine manufacturers cannot be sued and are not held legally liable for vaccine-related injuries and/or death if the injury or death resulted from "side effects" (including permanent brain damage, paralysis and death) that were "unavoidable" even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings.

Moreover, In 2011 The US Supreme Court (in Bruesewitz v. Wyeth) was asked to rule on whether Congress had intended for the NCVIA to preempt State design-defect lawsuits. Although the Supreme Court did not specifically address and study the safety of vaccines, it nevertheless ruled that the NCVIA preempted State design-defect lawsuits due to the fact that vaccines come with unavoidable adverse side effects. As a result, the industry was de facto granted legal immunity and impunity from all vaccine-related injuries and deaths in the US. http://www.washingtonpost.com/…/…/02/22/AR2011022206008.html

In lieu of sueing vaccine manufacturers for vaccine-related injuries and deaths in the courts, victims could only file a claim for compensation through the (US taxpayers-funded) National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP).
According to official data published by the NVICP, the US government (i.e. US taxpayers) has paid over 3,5 BILLION dollars in compensation to 17,732 victims of vaccine injury in the US from 1988-2017 ~ 16,523 injuries and 1,209 deaths (see data enclosed): https://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensa…/…/statisticsreport.pdf

However, it should be noted that this data does not take into account and reflect all of the vaccine-related injuries and deaths in the US since not all victims file a claim of compensation through the NVICP, and of those that do only about a third receive compensation related to vaccine-related injuries/deaths.

As a direct result of both the 1986 NCVIA and the 2011 US Supreme Court ruling, both the number of vaccines mandated by the CDC as well as vaccine-related injuries and deaths have (unsurprisingly) exponentially increased in the US. Moreover, there are over 250 new vaccines waiting in the pipeline (as of 2017) and an avalanche of mandatory vaccination legislation being voted accross the US, such as SB277 which mandates vaccinations for all school children in the State of California.

Unless and until the 1986 NCVIA is legally fought and repealed, the vaccine/pharmaceutical industry will continue to maim and prematurely kill hundreds of millions of pregnant women, fetuses, newborns, children and adults alike in the US with total immunity and impunity. And once the US Dept of Human Health and Services (HHS) rubber stamps and labels vaccines as "safe" - which it will soon do thanks to Del Bigtree's recent legal notice to the Secretary of the HHS Alex Azar (a former top pharma executive) asking for "mandates for safer childhood vaccines" - and the US govt mandates and forcefully injects pregnant women, fetuses, newborns, children and adults alike with hundreds of "safe" vaccines waiting in the pipeline, (+250 at the time of writing this note) it will open the floodgates to the vaccine Holocaust...

In my opinion, the only way to avoid the coming vaccine Holocaust in the US is by legally fighting and repealing the 1986 NCVIA. For those who are concerned about the health and the lives of their children in the US, I suggest that you urgently research the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and (collectively) LEGALLY FIGHT to REPEAL the Act if you want to avoid the coming vaccine Holocaust in the US.

NEVER FORGET THAT EVERYTHING HITLER DID IN GERMANY WAS LEGAL ~ Martin Luther King.

Arya Vrilya

Saturday, November 25, 2017

NO, THE ZIKA VIRUS DOES NOT CAUSE MICROCEPHALY!


There is not an iota of evidence in the scientific and medical literature of a causal relationship between the Zika virus and microcephaly, contrary to the deceitful and fraudulent claims made by both Tom Frieden/CDC and Margaret Chan/WHO. Furthermore, out of the 404 diagnosed cases of microcephaly in Brazil, the virus has purportedly been found in the tissues of less than 15 babies (0.034%), which does not prove causality let alone correlation.

According to the medical literature, microcephaly is caused by:

- Craniosynostosis: The premature fusing of the joints (sutures) between the bony plates that form an infant's skull keeps the brain from growing.

- Chromosomal abnormalities. Down syndrome and other conditions may result in microcephaly.

- Decreased oxygen to the fetal brain (cerebral anoxia). Certain complications of pregnancy or delivery can impair oxygen delivery to the fetal brain.

- Infections of the fetus during pregnancy. These include toxoplasmosis, cytomegalovirus, German measles (rubella) and chickenpox (varicella).

- Exposure to drugs, alcohol or certain toxic chemicals in the womb. Any of these put your baby at risk of brain abnormalities.

- Severe malnutrition. Not getting adequate nutrition during pregnancy can affect your baby's development.

- Uncontrolled phenylketonuria, also known as PKU, in the mother. PKU is a birth defect that hampers the body's ability to break down the amino acid phenylalanine.
Source: http://www.mayoclinic.org/…/micr…/basics/causes/con-20034823

In fact, in the US there are on average 25,000 diagnosed cases of microcephaly every year (in the absence of the Zika virus). Moreover, although the virus has been widely diagnosed in neighboring Colombia and in both French polynesia and Micronesia, there has been no diagnosed cases of microcephaly in those countries. This further proves that microcephaly is not caused by the Zika virus.

Many independent researchers have linked the “spike” of microcephaly in Brazil (from 147 diagnosed cases in 2014 to 404 in 2015) to a number of plausible factors such as the GM mosquitoes released in the region, the Tdap vaccine administered to pregnant women in late 2014, larvicides (pyriproxyfen) added to the public drinking water supply, and birth-causing pesticides such as glyphosate/Roundup, atrazine, 2,4-D, etc. copiously sprayed in GM soy/crop plantations in Brazil (note: Brazil is the largest consumer of pesticides in the world).

Although it is highly plausible that a synergistic combination of the above factors could be responsible for the “spike” of microcephaly in Brazil, there is to my knowledge no evidence in the scientific and medical literature of any causal relationship between the GM mosquitoes, the Tdap vaccines, the larvicide pyriproxyfen and microcephaly. Further epidemiological studies and research is clearly needed to confirm the causal relationship between the above plausible factors and microcephaly.

Pesticides, birth-defects and microcephaly

On the other hand, there is ample documented evidence in the scientific and medical literature of a causal relationship between pesticides such as glyphosate/Roundup, atrazine, 2,4-D, etc. and various birth defects, including microcephaly: http://www.beyondpesticides.org/…/pesticide-i…/birth-defects

In fact, birth defects and microcephaly are ubiquitous in regions and villages surrounding GM soy plantations in both Brazil and Argentina. In 2010, Dr. Andre Carrasco from Argentina published an alarming paper on the causal relationship between glyphosate based herbicides (GBH) and birth defects.

Dr Carrasco alarmingly found and wrote: “The direct effect of glyphosate [on the embryos]… opens concerns about the clinical findings from human offspring in populations exposed to GBH [glyphosate-based herbicides] in agricultural fields. There is growing evidence raising concerns about the effects of GBH on people living in areas where herbicides are intensely used. Women exposed during pregnancy to herbicides delivered offspring with congenital malformations, including microcephaly, anencephaly [missing major parts of brain and skull in embryos], and cranial malformations.” Link to the paper: http://www.gmwatch.org/imag…/pdf/Carrasco_research_paper.pdf

Unsurprisingly, however, neither the WHO/Margaret Chan, the CDC/Tom Frieden nor the Brazilian and global so-called public health authorities ever mention the causal relationship between GBH and microcephaly. It is blatantly obvious that the WHO/CDC deceitful and fraudulent Zika-microcephaly propaganda is manufactured for the sole purpose of promoting and selling the soon-coming concocted (toxic) Zika vaccine and to further mass poison both the Brazilian and the global population with the ongoing massive spraying of poisonous insecticides/pesticides under the guise and pretext of eradicating the WHO/CDC/industry invented Zika-microcephaly causing mosquitoes while enriching Big Pharma, the biotech/pesticide industry and their minions.

Arya Vrilya
Founder & Executive Director
Yajna Centre

Wednesday, October 04, 2017

THE ZIKA-MICROCEPHALY HOAX IS A REPLAY OF THE MURDEROUS DDT-POLIO SHAM


DDT-POLIO


1946-1955: Mass DDT spraying campaigns across the US to purportedly kill mosquitoes (fraudulently) blamed for carrying the polio virus and causing poliomyelitis paralysis. Mass DDT spraying campaign ended up CAUSING the poliomyelitis paralysis epidemic in the US in the 1950's.

In response, Big Pharma developed and administered over 100 million doses of the polio vaccine to children and pregnant women in the US, which CAUSED millions of cases of poliomyelitis paralysis in the US!

In 1992, the CDC publicly admitted that every case of poliomyelitis paralysis in the US since the early 1960's was CAUSED by the oral polio vaccine (OPV) used in the US from the early 1960's to 2000! Moreover, as far back as 1976, Dr Salk publicly admitted under testimony that the OPV used in the US from the early 1960's to 2000 was "the principal if not the sole cause" of all poliomyelitis paralysis cases in the US since 1961.

Read this paper for details about the murderous DDT-POLIO hoax: https://www.academia.edu/34215258/BILL_GATES_et_al._POLIO_VACCINES_DDT_PARALYSIS_MONKEY_VIRUSES_and_CANCER

ZIKA-MICROCEPHALY HOAX (2015)


70 years later, Big Pharma and their criminal political minions i.e. CDC, WHO et al. are using the EXACT same murderous script with the ZIKA-MICROCEPHALY hoax.

- Mosquitoes (fraudulently) blamed for carrying the zika virus.

- Zika virus (fraudulently) blamed for causing microcephaly.

- Mass land and aerial spraying campaigns conducted in the US and worldwide by the US govt to purportedly kill zika-carrying mosquitoes using neurotoxic chemicals (i.e. NALED, a neurotoxic nerve gas developed and used by the NAZI's during WW2 for chemical warfare) that have been proven to CAUSE neurological brain damage in fetuses, newborns and children including MICROCEPHALY!

Jennifer Sass PhD, senior scientist with Natural Resources Defense Council warned that Naled is a neurotoxin and “among the class of the most toxic pesticides.” According to Dr. Sass, pregnant women are the most at risk because Naled “would damage the neurological development of fetuses.” Moreover, Dr. Elvia Melendez-Ackerman, environmental biologist at the University of Puerto Rico’s Rio Piedras says: "Studies have shown that exposure of pregnant animals for just three days during brain development resulted in 15% smaller brains in their babies."

Naled is 20 times more toxic when exposure occurs through inhalation versus ingestion. Alarmingly, the CDC has mandated and carried out aerial sprayings of Naled over Miami in 2016 to purportedly kill mosquitoes carrying the zika virus. Naled is banned in the European Union due to its extreme toxicity for both human health and the environment. 

Big Pharma is now developing a zika vaccine (using $ BILLIONS from the public purse) which will likely CAUSE a spike in microcephaly and other neurological brain damage in fetuses, newborns and children, which will then conveniently but fraudulently be blamed on the mosquitoes, further poisoning fetuses, newborns, children, pregnant women and the global population with global mandatory zika vaccination campaigns, leading to an endless and murderous cycle of global zika vaccination campaigns and a global epidemic of microcephaly and other neurological brain damage in children worldwide.

You can read this paper for more details about the Zika-Microcephaly hoax: https://www.academia.edu/34216411/NO_THE_ZIKA_VIRUS_DOES_NOT_CAUSE_MICROCEPHALY

Arya Vrilya

Saturday, August 12, 2017

BILL GATES et al., POLIO VACCINES, DDT, PARALYSIS, MONKEY VIRUSES AND CANCER



Summary
Polio vaccines contaminated with cancer-causing monkey virus (SV40)
In 2007, the US Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) alarmingly admitted that between 1955–1963 over 98 million American children and pregnant women received one or more doses of a polio vaccine which was found to be contaminated with a cancer-causing monkey virus called Simian Vacuolating 40 (SV40).
SV40 found in several human cancers.

In 1961, the virus was found to cause tumors in rodents (Eddy et al., 1961) The SV40 virus was also found in several types of tumors in humans, for instance mesotheliomas (rare tumors located in the lungs), brain, and bone tumors (Carbone et al., 1994; Jasani et al., 2001). More recently, SV40 has also been found to be associated with some types of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (Shivapurkar et al., 2002; Vilchez et al., 2002).

SV40 was linked with mesothelioma after tumors developed in hamsters that were injected with SV40 into the lungs, heart and abdomen (Cicala et al., 1993). Mesotheliomas are rare cancers usually located in the lining of the lungs in humans and are believed to be associated with asbestos exposure. SV40 has been found in 47% to 83% of human mesothelioma tumors (Carbone, 1999). In addition, reports have documented an association between SV40 and brain and bone tumors (Jasani, 2001). Two recent studies also found an association between SV40 and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (Shivapurkar et al., 2002; Vilchez et al., 2002). These studies identified the virus in 42 to 43 percent of non-Hodgkin's tumors, while finding no SV40 in tissue from healthy study volunteers.

The CDC and the industry claim that the SV40 virus was removed from all polio vaccines after 1963. However, recent published studies as well as legal documents from a court case filed against the manufacturer of the vaccine (Lederle) reveal that SV40 was not removed from the oral polio vaccines after 1963. Over 600 million doses of the oral polio vaccines were manufactured and sold by Lederle in the US and around the globe between 1963-2000.
Oral Polio Vaccine found to CAUSE polio and poliomyelitis paralysis!
Moreover, In 2000 the CDC discontinued and banned the sale and the use of the OPV in the US because it was found to cause both vaccine-derived polio viruses (VDPVs) and vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP).
A paper published in 2004 by prominent and eminent vaccine researcher and author Neil Z. Miller [11] reveals that: “In 1992, the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published an admission that the live polio virus vaccine (OPV) had become the dominant cause of polio in the United States. In fact, according to CDC figures, every case of polio in the U.S. since 1979 was caused by the oral polio vaccine. As far back as 1976, "Dr. Jonas Salk, creator of the killed-virus polio vaccine (IPV) used in the 1950s, testified that the live-virus polio vaccine (used almost exclusively in the U.S. from the early 1960s to 2000) was the ‘principal if not sole cause’ of all reported polio cases in the U.S. Since 1961.”
DDT caused poliomyelitis paralysis in the US
Historical and recent scientific evidence alarmingly reveals a causal link between the mass DDT spraying campaigns launched in the US from 1946-1955 to purportedly combat the polio virus before the polio vaccines were developed and the epidemic of poliomyelitis paralysis that followed.
In light of the alarming and damning historical and scientific evidence presented in this paper on the extreme toxicity, human health hazards and inefficacy of the polio vaccines (both the IPV and the OPV), why are you Bill GatesMelinda Gates, the Bill & Melinda Gates FoundationUNICEF, the World Health Organization (WHO), the Global Polio Eradication InitiativeRotary International and the CDC forcefully vaccinating hundreds of millions/billions of children and their mothers around the globe without their informed consent and often under military escort and at gun point with the SV40-contaminated and cancer-causing oral polio vaccine (OPV) which has been discontinued and banned in the US since 2000 because it was found and proven to cause both vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP) and vaccine-derived polioviruses (VDPVs) ?
Link to my paper: https://www.academia.edu/34215258/BILL_GATES_et_al._POLIO_VACCINES_DDT_PARALYSIS_MONKEY_VIRUSES_and_CANCER


Saturday, May 13, 2017

HOW CHINA IS MASS POISONING BILLIONS OF PEOPLE AND THE ENVIRONMENT WITH THE PRODUCTION OF GLYPHOSATE AND THE IMPORTATION AND CONSUMPTION OF GM ROUNDUP READY SOY AND CORN



China: Largest producer and exporter of glyphosate

China is the largest producer and exporter of glyphosate, the declared active ingredient in Monsanto's infamous and highly toxic Roundup herbicide, as well as in other glyphosate based herbicides (GBHs). In 2015, China produced over 800,000 metric tons of glyphosate, which represented roughly 70% of global production. Over 80% of China's production of glyphosate is exported in six countries, with the US, Brazil and Argentina representing 55-60% of the export market. The balance is consumed locally in China.[1]

China: Largest importer & consumer of GM RR Soy and corn

China is also the largest importer and consumer of genetically modified (GM) Roundup Ready (RR) soy beans, importing over 90 million metric tons of GM RR soy beans in 2015, with imports and consumption projected to exponentially increase to over 140 million metric tons by 2020-2025 (see graph below). The overwhelming vast majority of the GM RR soy beans imported into China are used for livestock feed; the rest is used for human consumption. [2]


The US, Brazil and Argentina are the three biggest producers and exporters of genetically modified Round Up Ready soybeans, accounting for over 80% of global production and 90% of global exports, with China representing 60% of their export market. The US, Brazil and Argentina are also the three largest GMO producers, accounting for 78% of global GMO production in 2016. [3]

The industrial chemical-intensive agricultural production of RR GM soy, corn, cotton and canola doused in glyphosate/Roundup and other poisonous pesticides/biocides is mass poisining both billions of humans, animals, the soil, water, the air, the environment and all web of life in South America, in the US and elsewhere around the planet, as numerous peer reviewed and published studies have documented. [4][5]

As the late prominent scientist and director of the Institute for Science in Society Dr Mae-Wan Ho wrote and warned: “The vicious circle is now complete. China gave up producing soybeans and invested heavily in producing glyphosate instead, shortly after Monsanto’s patent for glyphosate expired in 2000. Most of the glyphosate is shipped to the top GM soybean producing countries US, Brazil and Argentina, where it is sprayed on Roundup Ready soybean to be exported back to China. Excessive glyphosate spraying has sickened people & wildlife in GM soybean producing countries (not to mention millions of hectares of natural forests cut down and natural grasslands destroyed), and a billion Chinese people are poisoned with toxic soybeans. The international group of NGOs are right [1], China holds the key to world health, only China can break this vicious circle that devastate people and planet.” [6]

How Monsanto “cheated” to obtain approval of glyphosate/Roundup and of GM RR soybean and maize in China.

China’s Ministry of Agriculture has been accused of fraudulently authorizing Monsanto’s GM RR soybeans and maize that “cause systematic harm to mankind, animals, plants, microbes and the ecological environment” to enter and flood the Chinese market without carrying out proper risk assessments to make sure that GM RR soy and corn are safe for human consumption.

A petition [7] signed by more than 600 people all over China submitted to the State Council Legislative Affairs Office claims that the Chinese Ministry of Agriculture has “colluded” with Monsanto, allowing Monsanto to provide “fake samples, to carry out “false tests” and to “falsify safety conclusions” and have thus “cheated” both the Chinese government and billions of Chinese consumers, and seriously violated the State Council’s “Agricultural GMOs Safety Administration Regulation”, amounting to a “crime of endangering public security.”

Not only has the Chinese Ministry of Agriculture ignored the harm that can be caused by glyphosate/Roundup residues in Monsanto's GM RR soybeans; it has also refused to tell the truth on how Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide obtained its pesticide registration in China in 1988, and how Monsanto’s Roundup Ready soybean 40-3-2 and NK603 maize obtained their bio-safety certificate from the Chinese Ministry of Agriculture.

It transpired that for its pesticide registration of Roundup, Monsanto “cheated” the Chinese government and the Chinese people. First, Monsanto intentionally did not inform the Chinese Ministry of Agriculture that glyphosate was patented as a chelator, which causes systematic harm to the health of the soil, microbes, crops, animals and humans.

Second, Monsanto failed to inform the Chinese Ministry of Agriculture that the US Environment Protection Agency (EPA) had in 1985 classified glyphosate as a possible carcinogen. 

Third, Monsanto did not provide reports on the long-term, lifetime and three-generation study revealing the carcinogenicity of glyphosate. And fourth, Monsanto submitted a “Roundup toxicology test report issued by Younger Laboratories on 23 December 1985”, which has all the appearances of being an “outright fraud.

As for the bio-safety certificate for glyphosate-tolerant GM soybean 40-3-2 and maize NK 603, the petition alleges that the leaders of the Ministry of Agriculture, China’s Centers for Disease Control and Monsanto “colluded internally and externally.” They used “fake samples, falsified tests, and made false safety conclusions”, writes Dr Mae-Wan Ho.

The petition includes 23 attachments containing documentary evidence bearing out its allegations of the Ministry of Agriculture’s wrongdoings, four of which are in English, the rest in Chinese. Among the attachments are collections of scientific papers published in Chinese and in English on the toxicities of glyphosate herbicides. [8]

Marked deterioration in China’s public health blamed on imports and consumption of GM RR soybeans.

Among the attachments included in the petition is a quotation from an article entitled “We must face the harm caused by imported GM soybeans to 1.3 billion Chinese people” written by Mi Zhen-yu, former Vice President of Academy of Military Science, Doctoral tutor, and Lieutenant General, and published by Science & Technology Abstracts Newspaper 25 April, 2014. [9]

The document highlights the rapid deterioration of public health in China over the past 10-20 years, correlating with the rapid increase in imports and consumption of GM RR soybeans in China [10]


In 1996, the rate of birth defects among the newborn in China was 0.87 %; in 2000, it increased to 1.09 %; and in 2010, to 1.53%

A survey reported by Reference News on June 2, 2013 found the rate of severe depression in people over 60 years old in China is as high as 40 %
The Xinmin Evening News reported on 22 November 2011 that the rate of precocious puberty in Chinese girls has increased 10-fold over the past 10 years
The first “Public Health White Paper” issued by the Beijing Municipal Government in 2010 revealed that Type II diabetes has increased 11.7 fold
The Zhengzhou Daily News reported on 2 April 2013 that the number of children confirmed with autism has increased 100 fold during the past 20 years
The Chengdu Daily reported on 20 February 2013 that the prevalence of childhood cancer is increasing, on average there is one cancer patient for each 10 000 children. Among juvenile cancer patients, leukaemia, brain tumour, malignant lymphoma and neuroblastoma are the top 4.
The “2012 Chinese male sperm quality survey white paper” of the China Population Association reports that the total number of infertility patients in China already exceeded 50 million, accounting for 15.6 % of the child-bearing age population. Ten years ago in 2002, this figure was 8 %, and 20 years ago in 1992, it was 3 %, 40 years ago during the 1970s, infertility was not more than 1 %
According to a report by the Xinhua website, the prevalance of Parkinson’s patients in China has increased more than 20-fold during the last 20 years
Currently, the prevalance ofcardiovascular disease has exceeded 13 %; and prevalence of chronic kindney disease has reached 10 %.

These grim figures in China echo the increases in 22 chronic and lethal diseases in the US that closely parallel and correlate with the exponential rise of glyphosate/Roundup and GMO's in the US [11,12]


Similar upsurges in birth defects and cancers have also been observed in Argentina as GM RR soybean cultivation increases. [13]


Environmental and human health NGO's ask China to ban glyphosate/Roundup and GM RR soy/corn


Ten environmental health NGOs have written an Open Letter [14] to the Chinese Ambassador to the UK asking China to suspend exports of glyphosate and imports of GM RR soy/corn while independent testing is carried out.


Excerpts of the Open letter:


We are genuinely frightened by the harm currently being done to the health of your citizens and indeed the health of people across the planet. We understand that China already is the largest producer and exporter of glyphosate in the world, including supplies exported to Monsanto for use in the manufacture of Roundup formulations worldwide.


Accordingly, we ask that your Government accepts that it shoulders, together with Monsanto, some responsibility for the devastating harm to public health in those countries importing glyphosate/Roundup from China. We are also concerned that there may be massive claims for compensation in the near future.


China is also the largest importer of 'Roundup Ready' (RR) soybeans and maize, thus contributing to the ongoing production of these varieties in the USA, Argentina and Brazil. It will be no easy thing to close down factories and to ban the use of the chemical in town and country; and if imports of RR soy and maize are stopped, they will have to be replaced with other products. But we respectfully ask you to take a global lead in this matter.


First, will you please commission appropriate scientific institutions in China to carry out independent long-term carcinogenicity, teratogenicity, endocrine developmental disruption, and multiple-generation reproduction toxicity tests on glyphosate alone, and on Roundup formulations? These studies should be carried out by institutions with no commercial or academic interest links with the glyphosate and/or related products industries, and with no connections to the earlier safety evaluation of glyphosate and/or related products.


We also believe that in China, as elsewhere, there should now be a nationwide programme of testing for glyphosate residues in surface water, underground water, animal and human urine, breast milk and blood. In parallel, we hope that you will see merit in a nationwide epidemiological investigation of the link between glyphosate/Roundup pollution (including traces contained in imported GM soybeans) and the increased incidence of malignant diseases during the past 20 years.

Second, before such studies are commissioned, we ask you as an essential precautionary measure immediately to suspend production/sales and exports of glyphosate, to suspend imports of Roundup formulations, and to suspend imports of all agriculture products (such as RR varieties) containing any glyphosate residues.


Finally, given the past frauds practised by IBT and Craven Labs in carrying out industry tests on pesticides, including glyphosate, we urge you to challenge Monsanto to place certain key reports [15] immediately into the public domain. If the corporation will not cooperate by releasing these documents without deletions or alterations, we will assume that there has been scientific malpractice and that the WHO findings of a glyphosate/cancer link are well founded.


Glyphosate should have been banned globally 35 years ago, and Roundup should never have been placed on the market. After decades of health damage, it must be in the interests of the whole world for these lethal chemicals to be taken immediately out of use before any more harm is done.


While many scientists in Europe and the Unites States share the concerns expressed above, there are many political and commercial obstacles to change. If China could take a lead in the manner which we respectfully suggest, placing the safety and good health of future generations above the commercial aspirations of multinational corporations, that would be something of truly historical importance for our planet.”


China has (tragically) decided and announced to become a global biotech/chemical superpower!

Unfortunately and tragically, the Chinese State has instead decided to embrace GMO's and pesticides and become a global leader in biotechnology. China must “boldly research and innovate, [and] dominate the high points of GMO techniques,” President Xi said in a 2013 speech. “[We] cannot let foreign companies dominate the GMO market.” [16]

To do so, ChemChina - China's State-owned chemical company- has decided to buy Syngenta – one of the largest biotech/chemical company in the world for $US 43 billion. “ChemChina has won around 82 percent support from Syngenta shareholders for its $43 billion takeover of the Swiss pesticides and seeds group, China's biggest foreign acquisition to date, the two companies said on Wednesday, 10 May 2017. [17]

Conclusion
To summarize and to conclude, China is the largest producer and exporter of glyphosate in the world, producing and supplying over 70% of the global market. China supplies glyphosate to Monsanto and the biotech/chemical industry, who in turn use it to manufacture Roundup and other toxic/poisonous glyphosate based herbicides (GBHs) which are copiously sprayed on both GM RR soybeans, corn and other GM RR crops, as well as on conventional food crops worldwide as a dessicant. Glyphosate/Roundup has been proven to cause a myriad of chronic and lethal human diseases as well as widespread environmental pollution and destruction worldwide, as numerous peer reviewed and published studies have documented.

China is also the largest importer and consumer of genetically modified (GM) Roundup Ready (RR) soy beans and corn, which are used for both livestock feed as well as human consumption. The consumption of GM RR soybeans and corn doused in glyphosate/Roundup are also extremely toxic to both human and animal health. Moreover, the industrial and chemical intensive agricultural production of GM RR soy and corn is mass poisoning billions of people, animals, the soil, water, the air, the environment and all web of life in South America, in the US and elsewhere around the world where GM RR crops are grown.

Therefore, China must stop producing, exporting and supplying glyphosate to the biotech/chemical industry and stop importing and consuming GM RR soybeans and corn to protect and to save both the health and the lives of billions of Chinese and humans around the world as well as the environment globally.

Arya Vrilya

Footnotes & references


[2] Ibid


[4] Banishing Glyphosate, Institute for Science and Society: http://www.i-sis.org.uk/Banishing_Glyphosate.php

[5] A Roundup of Roundup® Reveals Converging Pattern of Toxicity from Farm to Clinic to Laboratory Studies, Institute for Science and Society: http://www.i-sis.org.uk/Roundup_of_Roundup.php




[9]We Must Face the harm caused by imported GM soybeans to 1.3 billion Chinese people”, Mi Zhen-yu, Science & Technology Abstracts Newspaper, 25 April 2014, http://t.cn/8skNH8S

[10] http://www.i-sis.org.uk/Chinas_Ministry_of_Agriculture_Accused_of_Colluding_with_Monsanto.php

[11]Swanson NL, Leu A, Abrahamson J and Wallet B. Genetically engineered crops, glyphosate and the deterioration of health in the United States of America. Journal of Organic Systems 2014, 9, 6-37.

[12]Saunders PT. Marked deterioration of public health parallels increase in GM crops and glyphosate use, US government data show. Science in Society 65

[13] (Devastating Impacts of Glyphosate Use with GMO Seeds in Argentina, Institute for Science and Society.

[14] Source: http://www.i-sis.org.uk/Ten_NGOs_Ask_China_to_Stop_Producing_Glyphosate.php

[15] 'A Three-Generation Reproduction Study in Rats with Glyphosate' (Final Report; Bio/dynamics Project No. 77-2063; March 31, 1981) -- submitted by Monsanto to EPA
'Addendum to Pathology Report for a Three-Generation Reproduction Study in Rats with Glyphosate. R.D. #374; Special Report MSL-1724; July 6, 1982' EPA Registration No 524-308, Action Code 401. Accession No 247793. CASWELL#661A' -- submitted by Monsanto to EPA
'A Lifetime Feeding Study of Glyphosate (Roundup Technical) in Rats' (Report by GR Lankas and GK Hogan from Bio/dynamics for Monsanto. Project #77-2062, 1981: MRID 00093879) -- submitted by Monsanto to EPA. Including the study's 4-volume Quality Control evaluation of the Bio/dynamic assessment performed by Experimental Pathology Laboratories, Inc. (2,914 pp).
Also Addendum Report #77-2063
Knezevich, AL and Hogan, GK (1983) 'A Chronic Feeding study of Glyphosate (Roundup Technical) in Mice'. Project No 77-2061. Bio/dynamics Inc for Monsanto. Accession No #251007-251014 -- document not available but cited in EPA 1986 Memo.
Follow-up study: McConnel, R. 'A chronic feeding study of glyphosate (Roundup technical) in mice: pathology report on additional kidney sections'. Unpublished project no. 77-2061A, 1985, submitted to EPA by Bio/dynamics, Inc.